High Resolution lunar images – Just how High ?

In 2015 I’ve been able to acquire some High Resolution (HR) lunar images due to some excellent seeing conditions from September to December. I must say that I’ve been very lucky with such conditions, and moreover, been lucky to have the 355mm F/5 Newtonian ready for such imaging sessions, since I’ve been working for almost one year to have it prepared for this period of the year (when I usually have very good seeing at my location).

Now I can show a few results regarding the ability of such a scope to resolve small details of just a few hundred meters on the Moon.

I’ll post the measurement results for some of the September images, measurements done using the LROC interactive map.

The initial two posts from which the data was measured can be found here and here.

The following images show just some areas from the original mosaics,  with only a few details (craters, rimae) measured, in order to have a fairly clean presentation. One can easily compare my measurements with other details in the images, thus evaluating other details and their sizes.

Three results already presented on this blog:

rimaeboscovichmaximilian2015.jpg

hadleyrillemaximilian2015.jpg

inadetailsmaximilian2015.jpg

And three new measurements:

resolutionA.jpg

resolutionB.jpg

resolutionC.jpg

These last three images were measured using a new reprocessed version of the September 5th Ptolemaeus/Alphonsus/Arzachel mosaic.

This time the processing was performed only in AutoStakkert!2 (aligning) (A BIG Thank you Emil Kraaikamp for this fantastic software!), AstraImage 4.0 (wavelets, deconvolution, multiscale contrast, noise removal) (A BIG Thank you Stuart Hodgson from Astra Image Company, another superb piece of software!) and for the final mosaic I’ve used the very good Microsoft ICE. Usually I also use Photoshop CS2 (“old-school”) for the final result, but for this specific interest (measurements) all processing was kept to a minimum to show only the actual data, with no artifacts or cosmetic post-processing.

Now, the reprocessed version of the above mentioned mosaic, enlarged to 140% (it was processed at 140% from the start):

HRMoonLandscape.jpg

This result might not be very “pretty”, with a lot of blurry crater rims, but the important details (the smallest detectable craters) show a little better compared to the initial result, which is shown below (it does not have the Rupes Recta “glued” with the rest of the image):

PtolemaeusAlphonsusArzachelMaximilian2015.jpg

Now, as a general conclusion, it can be observed that in excellent seeing conditions, and using good equipment (ASI 120MM-S camera in my case with a Baader Red filter and the superbly good Baader 2.25x Barlow) it can be possible to acquire lunar images that show details as small as 350 meters wide! They might be hard to observe in the end result, but they are detectable. This is pretty good news I hope for any amateur not having a large 1 meter scope in his backyard.

For me, it’s a good motivation for getting a much larger mirror, like a 500mm one🙂

I’m already saving my money…

I should perhaps find myself a buyer for this 14 inch scope, that looks more like a radio-telescope…

telescope.jpg

…but not just yet😉

Max

 

2 Responses to “High Resolution lunar images – Just how High ?”

  1. First of all, WOW. And I mean it – WOOOOOOOOOOOOW!!!

    Whenever I’m out looking at the moon – I only do visual – I always try to see what the smallest feature I can see is. It’s always a hunt for the smallest crater, usually in the seas where they stand out very well. But lately, one of the things I do is to see if I can see any craters at all on the floor of Plato. So far, I haven’t been able to see any at all.

    Second of all, that is just about the coolest looking telescope I’ve ever seen. Wow! I assume you had to have built that yourself. Amazing!

    Now I’ll have spend the next few hours reading your blog. Gee, thanks soooo much for wasting my day. (Just kidding!)

    • Thank you Jon! Whenever the seeing is truly good, I spend around 10 to 15 minutes after the imaging session to do some visual observations. I’m using a very good Baader 2.25x barlow at different amplifications and a cheap Chinese SkyWatcher planetary eyepiece. Regardless to the not so good optics in this eyepiece, the views are fantastic. Some chromatic aberrations (mostly to the edges) are present, but at the center, and during steady conditions, the four major craters inside Plato are surrounded by a few other 1 kilometer craterlets.
      Glad you like the scope, I think that your the second one that does, after me🙂
      Hope to have a good read (at least for the images) and hope the writing is not that bad🙂

      Clear skies and good seeing!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: